This is the best summary I could come up with:

Today's disclosure of XZ upstream release packages containing malicious code to compromise remote SSH access has certainly been an Easter weekend surprise...

The situation only looks more bleak over time with how the upstream project was compromised while now the latest twist is GitHub disabling the XZ repository in its entirety.

In any event, a notable step given today's slurry of news albeit in the disabled state makes it more difficult to track down other potentially problematic changes by the bad actor(s) with access to merge request data and other pertinent information blocked.

With upstream XZ having not issued any corrected release yet and contributions by one of its core contributors -- and release creators -- over the past two years called into question, it's not without cause to outright taking the hammer to the XZ repository public access.

Some such as within Fedora discussions have raised the prospects whether XZ should be forked albeit there still is the matter of auditing past commits.

Others like Debian have considered pulling back to the latest release prior to the bad actor and then just patching vetted security fixes on top.

The original article contains 282 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 33%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!