341
submitted 5 months ago by deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 5 months ago

Threads can still participate via comments on Lemmy. I believe they can also post to communities via hashtags?

[-] Blaze@dormi.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Mastodon has groups similar to Lemmy communities, Threads could definitely implement them too.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -4 points 5 months ago

And what kinds of trouble do you expect Threads users to create by participating in our communities?

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 5 months ago

Well, for one thing, Threads is already full of ads. And I don't mean Threads ads, I mean users posting ads, like ads for their own products or services or for their audience, trying to be an influencer and all that.

But it's not necessarily the users that will be problematic. It's more that by federating with Meta, you're giving value to Zuckerberg. And I don't want to do that.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
341 points (96.2% liked)

Fediverse

17538 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS