this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
495 points (97.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
564 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
495
temperature timeline (imgs.xkcd.com)
submitted 7 months ago by Bridger@sh.itjust.works to c/climate@slrpnk.net
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/earth_temperature_timeline.png

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of a scientist discussing an economics paper that said warming to +4°C would only cost 1% of GDP, so we should stop with all the warming alarmism.

The scientist remarked that if you entered -4°C in that calculation used in the paper you would also get 1% of GDP, but in reality -4°C would cover most of the major cities with a mile of ICE.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because think of the the FREE ICE! The ice economy would boom! Think of all the new ice jobs!

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"Selling ice to Eskimos," as the expression goes.