this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
411 points (91.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
117 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    411
    Money has changed microsoft (lemmy.world)
    submitted 7 months ago by Waffelson@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    which, confusingly enough, is a linux subsystem under windows. The name sounds like the opposite.

    [–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Really just an English problem. Read it as it is a subsystem by Windows for Linux.

    But yeah, LSW would've been more clear. Plus, it's almost LSD.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Linux Subsystem for DOS

    [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Getting DOS within Linux would be pretty interesting to play with and may get my dad a step closer to abandon windows.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

    There is DOSBox but idk how well that works

    [–] GreenSkree@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

    I think it makes more sense to read that it's a "Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (applications/programs)".

    [–] notTheCat@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

    Maybe it's some marketing thing? Like their feature MUST start with Windows™ regardless of getting confusing as hell, it may also help not techie people who make decisions and want to still use a Windows™ solution suggested by a techie

    [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

    It should be Windows's Subsystem for Linux.

    A better acronym might be Windows' Linux Subsystem.

    [–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 3 points 7 months ago

    WSL 1 is a compatibility layer that lets Linux programs run on the Windows kernel by translating Linux system calls to Windows system calls, so in that sense I understand the name: it’s a Windows subsystem for Linux [compatibility]. It doesn’t use the Linux kernel at all. With WSL 2 they’re using a real Linux kernel in a virtual machine, so there the name doesn’t make much sense anymore.