178
submitted 5 months ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] harfee@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 5 months ago

I think the article was pretty clear that (1) companies that use open source projects to make money should be contributing financially to them, and (2) users and contributors need to stop feeling entitled to maintainers' unpaid labor and time. Mostly 2 because it's a security risk AND a shitty way to treat people who are making something free for you.

[-] livus@kbin.social 3 points 5 months ago

users and contributors need to stop feeling entitled to maintainers’ unpaid labor and time

And the rest of us need to stand up for maintainers against bullies.

[-] pop@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Honestly, in medium to big projects, 2 seems like mostly astroturfing from companies who really want to hide the fact that they benefit financially but use alt accounts to push toxic bullying like "you're not following opensource principle, not foss this, not foss that, you do this or we're going to make a scene" when maintainers try to get any semblance of authority over their own projects.

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
178 points (96.4% liked)

Open Source

30339 readers
2365 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS