this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1018 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21260 readers
2057 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I guess I don't know what you mean by "authenticating transactions".

    [–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Online transactions require a second factor which displays the actual amount to be transferred. This works by either an app which receives the transaction data (recipient, how much) over the network, or a device which takes the bank card and is used to scan something similar to a qr code. The device then displays the transaction data.

    This makes sure a fraudulent site can't easily change the amount or the recipient of a transaction, even if they somehow made an identical website (or close enough).

    For remote transactions (e.g. online payments), the security requirements go even further, requiring a dynamic link to the amount of the transaction and the account of the payee, to further protect the user by minimising the risks in case of mistakes or fraudulent attacks.

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/intro/mip-online/2018/html/1803_revisedpsd.en.html

    It's not perfect, especially with people using a banking app and the second factor app on the same device for convenience sake.

    [–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

    Interesting. If they do that in the US some day, I would absolutely much rather buy that device than unroot my phone.