this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
156 points (95.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43856 readers
2252 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Just having one would be great. Thank you Apple (but why did so many Androids copy the removal?).

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

People are going to try to make up reasons, all of them are an excuse to cover up the real reason which is copying apple and forcing people into Bluetooth to sell more expensive tech junk to people. The original and really only reason.

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I believe it was for waterproofing. One less port means less sealing, making it easier to improve the waterproofing of the phone.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Water ingress isn’t the issue & there’s been waterproofed ports for decades. They wanted to make devices thinner—but what value is it when its too thin to support a jack & made of materials that now require a case?

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That's probably just the marketing reason. The realistic reason is probably that they want to sell you their brand of wireless earbuds that need to be replaced in a few years tops

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

That conspiracy is one I believe too. Seems too odd that all OEMs dropped their jacks at the same time they started selling buds.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's it, right there. Artificial exclusivity, that's what it always was anything else is an excuse to look or seem better or less scummy.

[–] Kindness@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Which is only likely to last one year anyways. After which, you can pay an exorbitant amount to replace the degrading glue. I'd just like my wired headphones back, the jack will last longer than a year at the very least.

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 0 points 7 months ago

Well it gives companies a bit more space to work with.