119
Flooded farms in England refused compensation as ‘too far’ from river
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
8484 readers
3 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Shouldn't it be the inverse? If you build too close to a river and your land floods that's on you.
No, too far from a river and its an act of God which at least in the us is in addition to standard homeowners insurance.
Ed: too close to the river and most insurance companies require a level of flood protection. Most will in fact have maps off coverage areas that require it.
For insurance purposes probably but it’s not that right? Government fund? Still crappy for them.