this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
517 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
5008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is obvious profit is not their concern.

Instead of releasing a film that by all accounts would have been profitable, so that they can create a loss for tax purposes.

Why not maximize.profits, even if it means more taxes?

The shareholders should have a legal case.

[โ€“] noxy@yiffit.net 3 points 7 months ago

I think the shareholders with enough shares to have influence are the ones who encourage this sort of behavior - if it's a long-term profit at the expense of short term, they aren't interested

That's my gut feeling on it anyways