536
Eww, Copilot AI might auto-launch with Windows 11 soon
(www.pcworld.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
536 points (94.7% liked)
Technology
59161 readers
2211 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So they have to be aggressive by automatically adding garbage nobody wants because otherwise people won't bother activating said garbage they don't want?
No, because most people stick with the default option regardless.
I'm just trying to understand my our point.... You argue they have to do this because people won't bother on their own... Then proceed to back your statement with an example where MS added garbage and people don't bother or can't figure to remove it...
I mean, you and I known MS could simply ask... They don't because they want that slide that says x many million users of Copilot...
No.
https://thedecisionlab.com/intervention/how-default-settings-doubled-organ-donation-rates-in-the-us https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855900/ https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions/opt-out-policies-increase-organ-donation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458339/
That's the best known case, but it's not limited to organ donation of course.
I didn't argue with that.
That doesn't mean they can't... At most it means is less advantageous for their goals.... Screw the user