this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
439 points (99.5% liked)

Gaming

19991 readers
108 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Literally victim blaming. Classy.

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Blaming the player goes a bit far, true.

That said, the sad truth is that companies only react when it affects their bottom line.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 1 points 7 months ago

Well, there's the other route. If they are forced legally to comply, which is what Ross is trying to get done, and is the far better option alongside being more expensive and difficult, because a company's reaction to finances can be reversed as soon as it doesn't matter or the public forgets.

[–] jyoskykid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is general knowledge that these companies do this. FSF has campaigned a lot against DRM, under the name Defective by Design.

When someone makes a contract with the devil and complains when it affects them, pointing it out is not victim blaming.