this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
197 points (79.6% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
2670 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was just watching a tiktok with a black girl going over how race is a social construct. This felt wrong to me so I decided to back check her facts.

(she was right, BTW)

Now I've been using Microsoft's Copilot which is baked into Bing right now. It's fairly robust and sure it has it's quirks but by and large it cuts out the middle man of having to find facts on your own and gives a breakdown of whatever your looking for followed by a list of sources it got it's information from.

So I asked it a simple straightforward question:

"I need a breakdown on the theory behind human race classifications"

And it started to do so. quite well in fact. it started listing historical context behind the question and was just bringing up Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, who was a German physician, naturalist, physiologist, and anthropologist. He is considered to be a main founder of zoology and anthropology as comparative, scientific disciplines. He has been called the "founder of racial classifications."

But right in the middle of the breakdown on him all the previous information disappeared and said, I'm sorry I can't provide you with this information at this time.

I pointed out that it was doing so and quite well.

It said that no it did not provide any information on said subject and we should perhaps look at another subject.

Now nothing i did could have fallen under some sort of racist context. i was looking for historical scientific information. But Bing in it's infinite wisdom felt the subject was too touchy and will not even broach the subject.

When other's, be it corporations or people start to decide which information a person can and cannot access, is a damn slippery slope we better level out before AI starts to roll out en masse.

PS. Google had no trouble giving me the information when i requested it. i just had to look up his name on my own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the problem with ai is CeNsOrShIp

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You don't see how a handful of big players controlling the narrative AI presents is a massive propaganda tool if everyone uses AI for their research?

[–] elshandra@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Rupert Murdoch has entered the chat.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No more than any other media source

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Other media sources can't personalize the propaganda specifically to your interaction and interaction history.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Apparently you're not familiar with tech companies? You just described exactly what's been happening for about 10 years

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A conversational interaction is fundamentally not the same as targeted ads.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

My opinion is that the issue is that people will instantly trust a machine despite seeing it make mistakes. Especially if it reinforces an existing view.