this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
940 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

60058 readers
2047 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should just use Linux, tbh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Win10 is the same these days.

When it launched it was lauded for having similar system requirements to Win7, and was easier to run than 8/8.1, but it just got more and more bloated over time as MS transitioned from a "sell Windows for a profit" business model to a "sell Windows for a profit and collect as much personal information and show as many ads as we can get away with for profit" business model.

Imagine what Microsoft could be achieving if they actually gave the slightest shit about actually improving their product? Windows could be amazing. But it isn't.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Windows 10 got a new kernel that was unquestionably better than the previous ones. This meant that even though it was a step backwards in some ways from Windows 7 (and 8 isn't even worth mention), it was capable of better performance.

I've asked a few times if anyone can give any good reasons for switching to 11 from 10 other than "it's newer" or "ms is sunsetting win10" and have yet to see a compelling response. Virtual desktop support is the best answer so far, but I had that on Windows 20 years ago with litestep (I think that's what it was called, it was an alternate desktop program).

It seems that Microsoft has just decided that they are going to throw their market dominance and reputation (which for some reason is good in the business and government world) around rather than offer good products.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

uhm, i believe win 11 has a better scheduler. It schedules more efficiently. That's the one argument i've heard in favor of win11.

[–] Infinitus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that it's scheduler is better for those Intel bigLittle CPUs

that could be it. I never asked, the person that relayed that says it was significant enough for win11 to run faster than win10 for them. No idea how much i trust them on that one though.