this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
300 points (96.9% liked)

News

23284 readers
3421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Greased by lobbying and campaign cash, tax breaks for retirement savings are one thing Congress agrees on. But they also blow out the deficit and add to income inequality.

Five months before Congress faced a near-catastrophic standoff over the debt ceiling, with Republicans demanding restrictions to food and Medicaid programs to rein in spending, a bill that raised the cost of private retirement savings accounts to $282 billion per year was quietly signed into law.

In this era of deeply divided politics, the 2022 bill known as Secure 2.0 was hailed as a bipartisan success — a victory for average Americans. It had sailed through the House by a whopping 414-5 vote. It followed four other major bills passed between 1996 and 2019 that dramatically expanded taxpayer savings – all equally lauded as bipartisan victories.

But that rare issue that brought a divided Washington together also increased wealth disparities and the federal deficit. And the victory was most strongly applauded by the burgeoning financial services industry, for whom tax-advantaged retirement savings has transformed a $7 trillion retirement market in 1995 to a $38.4 trillion behemoth in 2023.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

We were talking to my daughter about this just yesterday. It's not even groceries. People think that if you spend $30 or $40 a month on things that make you and those you love happy, you'll never save enough to make yourself marginally more comfortable in the last 10-20 years of your life (if you're lucky) that will be uncomfortable no matter what.

So I suppose maybe if I denied myself and my child every pleasure in life, sure, I could put money in a 401(k). That is not something I would do and I certainly do not think it's a good lesson to teach a child. I'm sure someone will call that some sort of "live for today" or YOLO attitude rather than not giving your child the most miserable childhood you can.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So I suppose maybe if I denied myself and my child every pleasure in life, sure, I could put money in a 401(k).

But that's unproductive hyperbole. Not every pleasure in life costs money, and lots of things you spend money on can be optimized. And even after doing that, if you still feel too squeezed, it might be worth considering a career change and a plan for how to get there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It might be unproductive hyperbole, but I've been told that exact same thing more than once right here on Lemmy.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Sounds like you have an axe to grind. Sorry life has been hard for you friend. Hope it gets better. Hang in there.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You were telling your daughter that you're spending $30/mo on her to make her happy instead of saving it for your old age? I don't know how you communicated that, but on the surface that does not sound like a healthy thing to tell a child.

If you're worried about providing your daughter a fulfilling childhood, maybe also consider prioritizing time with her? You spend a lot of time on Lemmy dude, is that time you could be spending with her? Or are you on your phone a lot when you're with her?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you think that maybe you don't pay attention to what actual times of day I'm on Lemmy vs. when I'm not on Lemmy and think that maybe I spend those times with my family?

I'm here a lot because I'm currently very sick (I recently got back from the Mayo Clinic). I suppose that's my fault?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, I've never paid attention to when you're online, I just see you average 100 comments and posts per day. I still think telling your daughter that you're spending $30/month on her instead of saving for retirement is not healthy.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I know a lot of people taking care of their elderly parents. I have yet to meet one who says they regretted their parents buying them toys. Do you know any?

Also, as I already said, I am on Lemmy a lot because I am very sick and have nothing else to do most of the time.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're misunderstanding my point. I'm saying it's not healthy to tell your young child explicitly that you're making this choice between buying them a toy or saving for retirement. This conversation started with you saying you just had that conversation with your daughter yesterday.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do you think the conversation was literally "I'm making a choice between buying you this toy and saving for retirement?" For one thing, she's almost 14.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Egad man, what is happening in your head

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Here is what is happening in my head.

You said:

I’m saying it’s not healthy to tell your young child explicitly that you’re making this choice between buying them a toy or saving for retirement.

I agree. But I don't have a young child anyway.

This conversation started with you saying you just had that conversation with your daughter yesterday.

That was not the conversation we had.

I hope this clears things up.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You should probably go up top there and change where you said "I just had this conversation with my daughter yesterday"....

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I did not say that. That is false. This is what I said and this is it in context:

In other words, I was talking to my daughter about people who think you should invest money rather than buy groceries.

Once again, I hope this clears things up.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not even a little 😕 Who exactly is telling you to invest your money instead of buying groceries?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The only person I've seen attempting to make that argument in this thread is you. It's been a really weird strawman thing.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I know a lot of people taking care of their elderly parents. I have yet to meet one who says they regretted their parents buying them toys. Do you know any?

Raises hand

Hello, I'm now paying out the ass for my parents not to starve in their old age. We were poor as shit growing up, but I know my parents never had a written budget and they could have made better financial choices. I'd still be supporting them but it wouldn't be as painful.

Every dollar spent on Christmas gifts that we forgot about a month later could have been a dollar invested in their retirement. I wish we'd decided as a family to not partake in gift exchanges and instead spend more time with each other. I wish my siblings and I had been encouraged to start working as teenagers to contribute to the family budget.

Most of all, I wish we'd had a clear financial plan as a family. I didn't figure out finances until my early 20s. The value of saving is something that should be taught at a young age.

[–] person420@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I promise you, if you put that $30/month into your own IRA, you'll make her a lot happier when she doesn't have to support you when she's grown up.

The problem isn't spending a little to make you or your family happy, it's spending for consumable things today, that's going to put you at a huge disadvantage later.

I get it, I have two kids, it's fucking expensive. But you know what's even more expensive? Taking care of old people.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 months ago

put that $30/month into your own IRA, you'll make her a lot happier when she doesn't have to support you when she's grown up.

Unfortunately, with all of the price-gouging that's been happening, $30/mo is nothing. It probably is now productive being spent. Even with compounding interest, that is going to result in enough funds to retire as an expat in a developing nation with an exceptional exchange rate and likely next to no end of life care, supposing that the investment firm that is profiting off of pensions being extinct does exceedingly well.

I also like to suggest saving anything that one can but noone is going to be able to realistically be able survive on that, unless there are significant socio-economic changes. It's a "pie in the sky when you die" situation.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

So I suppose maybe if I denied myself and my child every pleasure in life, sure, I could put money in a 401(k). That is not something I would do and I certainly do not think it’s a good lesson to teach a child.

I think that's an excellent lesson to teach a child.

Poverty sucks. Try to get out of it. Deny consumerism, save your money.