this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
102 points (93.2% liked)

Religious Cringe

844 readers
1 users here now

About

This is the official Lemmy for the r/ReligiousCringe***** subreddit. This is a community about poking fun at the religious fundamentalist's who take their religion a little bit too far. Here you will find religious content that is so outrageous and so cringeworthy that even someone who is mildly religious will cringe.

Rules

  1. All posts must contain religious cringe. All posts must be made from a religious person or must be showcasing some kind of religious bigotry. The only exception to this is rule 2

  2. Material about religious bigots made by non-bigots is only allowed from Friday-Sunday EST. In an effort to keep this community on the topic of religious cringe and bigotry we have decide to limit stuff like atheist memes to only the weekends.

  3. No direct links to religious cringe. To prevent religious bigots from getting our clicks and views directs links to religious cringe are not allowed. If you must a post a screenshot of the site or use archive.ph. If it is a YouTube video please use a YouTube frontend like Piped or Invidious

  4. No Proselytizing. Proselytizing is defined as trying to convert someone to a particular religion or certain world view. Doing so will get you banned.

  5. Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No exceptions.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheistmemes@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're confusing belief, knowledge, and conviction, it's a common issue with common, imprecise, language.

A sceptic would proportion their conviction of a position according to the available evidence. As there is no evidence to support any specific god, and some evidence against several gods, it is rational to be tentatively convinced there is no god. That position is atheist.

There are of course also other ways at arriving to an atheist position, not all of them reasonable.

You are however also engaging in either dishonest argumentation or esoteric sophistry horribly misreading the current discussion. It is reasonable, and polite, to assume a person knows their own mind better than any external person, and if prompted, has right of interpretation to their own beliefs, knowledge and convictions.

It's unreasonable, and unproductive, for me to assert you're secretly a Russian propagandist, and even more so when you say you aren't. I cannot know this better than you, and either I trust you to engage this conversation honestly, accurately describing your propagandist status, or I don't, and we have nothing more to gain from a discussion.

To adress your argument: the person is convinced they take an atheist position. You accusing them of unknowingly being a theist is thus absurd and/or dishonest.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is reasonable, and polite, to assume a person knows their own mind better than any external person, and if prompted, has right of interpretation to their own beliefs, knowledge and convictions.

No, I disagree. I agree with you that we have the right to interpret our own intentions freely, because intentions cannot reliably be externally sensed. But let me give an example as to our beliefs and biases.

Suppose I'm a scientist conducting trials on a new drug. I gather a group of volunteer test subjects, and begin trials to compare the drug to a placebo. However, after they take the drug (and placebo), some of the test subjects come to me and say "You don't have to test me, doc. I'm immune to placebos. I can feel this working, so I know I'm in the experimental group and I know the drug works great."

If I were to apply your idea that you can't mistrust someone else's biases and beliefs about themself, then I would have to take their word and my science would be garbage.

To adress your argument: the person is convinced they take an atheist position

Yes, my question proved that very neatly, didn't it? They didn't think they had any belief in being an atheist, and that the final line of the original meme was therefore nonsense. But I used a very elegant question to prove that they do have belief in being an atheist.

[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You seem fundamentally confused about this topic, unwilling to listen, and unequipped to further your understanding of neither crux, domain nor dialogue. We will not get further in this discussion.

Best of luck in your endeavours.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You think you can talk to me that way? Do you? Well have a lovely day too! I hope you find peace and enlightenment!

[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Love this actually, very funny <3