this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
577 points (86.9% liked)

Funny

6877 readers
1060 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No. It's not like your ridiculous example. Not even close.

[–] desconectado@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly, it's a ridiculous example because it sounds just as ridiculous as saying US and EU are in principle the same type of union.

I was being hyperbolic with my last sentence so you can see how ridiculous your statement sounds to me.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I didn't say they're in principle the same union.

I said the principle is the same.

The principle of multiple smaller states adhering to a larger entity that can enact rules over everyone, and then send representatives to this entity.

I can see how ridiculously bad your reading comprehension is