this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
421 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2362 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is trying to bring into politics a phenomenon that's taking off in college athletics: money for use of the former president's name, image and likeness in campaign ads.

In a letter this week, the Trump presidential campaign asked all down-ballot GOP campaigns for at least a 5% cut of the money raised from advertising that features the party's 2024 presumptive White House nominee.

"We ask that all candidates and committees who choose to use President Trump’s name, image, and likeness split a minimum of 5% of all fundraising solicitations to Trump National Committee JFC," said the April 15 letter signed by campaign co-campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 90 points 7 months ago (3 children)

So can the rest of the GOP also hold Trump financially responsible for the damage he has done to that party's (arguably already rather dubious) reputation?

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 58 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You're asking for accountability in the GOP? If you believe that's possible I've got a bridge to sell you.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I don't have space for a bridge at the moment, but I would be interested in some snake oil.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What about snake oil NFTs? I can do you a special deal!

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sold if you throw in a pair of golden sneakers.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Done! And a free Bible signed by Jesus himself!

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sorry, that would clutter the shelf. I already have a Trump bible.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

No, this one is on the east river. But wouldn't you know I have a friend who's selling the bay bridge!

I still find it amusing that's an actual thing sometime actually did.... Multiple times....

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know what? In the context of reputational damage to the GOP, I’d absolutely love to see this scenario play all the way out without any external intervention.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 8 points 7 months ago

I'm not saying I want to see an all-GOP cast do a live action reenactment of Lord of the Flies, but can trump be piggy? He even gets to do a speech!

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He has done

LMAO They did most of the damage themselves.

Might as well hold Hilary responsible for the damage he has done with her Pied Piper strategy.

[–] interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

Goddamn, the crux of my problem with the DNC in a nutshell