this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
177 points (86.1% liked)

Technology

34828 readers
20 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why are so many people ok with a world where you have no say in what your employer does, and they can do whatever they want to suit their bottom line?

Though I wonder how much of this is actually corpophilia and how much is people hiding behind it because they don't want to say "I'm glad these people I disagree with got fired".

Here are some threads to show what I'm talking about:

r/technology

r/conservative (though this one feels like cheating)

r/news

r/bayarea

r/google

hacker news

washington post comments

etc..

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eee@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago (4 children)

first of all, you lost me when you pointed to reddit.

second, they protested not just within the office, but in the personal office of one of the higher-ups. If you blockaded your CTO's office as a means of protesting world hunger, I don't think that would go well for you either.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If my company was helping perpetuate world hunger and I blockaded their office, I hope to God you wouldn't be gleeful at me getting fired

[–] huginn@feddit.it 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Not gleeful - just fully understanding why.

I admire their principled stand. They had to know it would cost them their jobs but chose to do it anyway.

Their firing isn't a surprise and is fully reasonable by the company. I hope they get great jobs elsewhere, where their morals will be appreciated... But there are very few workplaces that give a damn about morals.

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

At least we all agree that google is a piece of shit company.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Lets be clear, there's a difference between "reasonable" and "expected behavior" and it's an important one.

[–] huginn@feddit.it -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's both reasonable and expected.

We can discuss if a corporation deserves to exist but granted that it does: it is implicitly reasonable that it deserves to maintain its premises and staffing in a way that is conducive to business.

Now if you want to talk about corporate structures and the dissolution of capitalist enterprise that's a different story.

But in today's world and with today's rules it is entirely reasonable.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue corporations should strive to represent their employees. Corporations don't deserve to maintain anything, they aren't people and have no ethical status either.

Nonetheless you're working double time to make sure the use of 'reasonable' with all its connotations is seen as acceptable here. Making sure everyone knows that you think this is normative.

We will not reach a common ground.

[–] huginn@feddit.it -2 points 6 months ago

I'd argue corporations should strive to represent their employees.

That's not a corporation that's a co-op. I think cooperatives are great. Corporations less so.

Corporations don't deserve to maintain anything, they aren't people and have no ethical status either.

Ethical status isn't what I'm talking about here: I'm talking about legal protections for entities. A corporation is an entity and has legal protections.

Again we can discuss if capitalism should be the system we use but as long as it is then corporations will, by definition, have legal status and protections.

Nonetheless you're working double time to make sure the use of 'reasonable' with all its connotations is seen as acceptable here. Making sure everyone knows that you think this is normative.

It's absolutely mundane and normal. It's unnatural but not strange.

I'd rather the system didn't work like this: but it is entirely expected given the laws that govern the nation in which this occurred.

And that's by definition normative.

We will not reach a common ground.

You went from talking about concepts to directly attacking me. I wouldn't expect you'd ever come to a truce with someone you see as an enemy. I'm sorry you feel that way.

[–] eee@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I hope to God you wouldn’t be gleeful at me getting fired

I wouldn't be "gleeful", but I can definitely see why the company was within their rights to fire you.

This is like those nutbags who shut down a highway to protest the environment or something, then accuse the police of being un-environmental when they're invariably arrested.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 10 points 6 months ago

Shutting down the highway when the planet is literally burning up seems like a very obvious sign of outrage and great restraint as to not get violent despite that outrage, dont you think?

Arresting protestors during a largely ignored crisis which they protest seems kind of inhumane, no?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago

This is not at all like world hunger.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I still have zero regrets after walking away from my very very old reddit account. I torched everything I ever said, ground it into ash, stomped on it again, and then deleted my account. I still have my /. account though.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Those offices are usually locked down anyway, on floors where the unwashed masses aren't granted access. Hell, if you want to even be on a call with someone like the CTO you'll have to reach out to three different entities, book a specific room, and reach out to that person's team of assistants to ensure everything is aligned.

If they got access to the CTO office they definitely broke in, or evaded security in some way. That alone at any company will get you fired, and probably arrested.

Source: Once attended a meeting with a SVP at a big tech company. I genuinely think it would be easier to meet the president.