89
submitted 6 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago

you don't see any downside to nuclear escalation?

[-] bigpEE@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Countries that have nukes don't get invaded. Simple as

[-] AEsheron@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This isn't the same. Host nukes is not owning nukes, they seems to be proposing housing US nukes that Poland would not have control of, or be able to launch. With no launch codes, they aren't a valid deterrent to conventional war, unless the world is convinced the US would use them to protect Polish sovereignty, which would obviously not be on the table.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There's no way USA would ever let Russia (or any other enemy) even near the nukes in Poland.

So really hosting USA's nukes provides a double guarantee for help in case of invasion on top of NATO

[-] bigpEE@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

How many countries owning or hosting nukes have been invaded?

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
89 points (96.8% liked)

World News

32291 readers
620 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS