Asklemmy

43817 readers

941 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What do we think about the new DDG AI Chat feature? (duckduckgo.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by reallyzen@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A "natural language query" search engine is what I need sometimes.

Edit: directly reachable with the !ai bang

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Rule or trend, whatever word you use is semantics at this point.

Hardly. There is a very clear distinction between a rule & a trend.

And your experience is irrelevant to the facts of how all current LLM’s are built. They are all built the same way. We have proof they are all built the same way.

They are not all built the same, though. Claude, for instance, is built with a framework of values called "Constitutional AI". It's not perfect, as the developers even state, but it is a genuine step in the right direction compared to many of its contemporaries in the AI space.

If you talk to someone and you know they lie to you 10% of the time, would you ever take anything they day at face value?

Humans are not tools that can be improved upon. They are sentient beings that have conscious choice. LLMs are the former, and are not the latter.

They are not 1:1 comparisons as you claim.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are wrong and tiresome. Goodbye.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And yet I've provided sources for each and every one of my assertions, while you have not.

Good day.