315
Start menu ads are officially here with the latest Windows 11 optional update
(www.xda-developers.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
315 points (96.5% liked)
Technology
34785 readers
369 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Linux Mint at home and Windows 11 Enterprise at the office.
I still don't see a single actual advantage of W11 over 10. The OS drains more system resources so it's less performant, and every other "feature" I've seen looks like a double edged sword at best, or an anti-feature at worst.
I have had literally the exact opposite experience. Performance is better, "resource usage" is more or less the same, and most importantly battery life was like 50% better (still awful on my machine, but less bad).
From the user's perspective there really aren't any. MS could have stopped with W10, or even W7, and things would have been just fine.
Currently, DirectStorage and the thread scheduler for those with current Intel processors.
Only if you absolutely need Win11 features. There's very little at work that I actually need a Windows computer for, I'd do way better with a Linux desktop.
Office 365 is fine for some people, but all I need is a plaintext editor, SSH capabilities, and a couple HTTPS communications utilities. LibreOffice would be fine for the few documents I need to share, most of the rest is a git wiki.
Did you miss "in the office"?
Most people don't have a choice, their OS is decided upon and managed by their employer.
Plus, there's definitely benefits to using the most popular setup if you have to interact with the normal business side folks more. LibreOffice's cross compatibilty with Microsoft formats can still be sketchy with some of the more complex features.
I certainly didn't miss "in the office." For my office use, at a very large corporation, I personally have no need for Windows at all. None of the people on my team have a need for Windows.
My entire team would be more efficient with a Linux desktop.
OF COURSE my team doesn't have a choice. OF COURSE most people who work at a mid size or larger corporation don't have a choice. But we ALSO don't use Win 11. The implication in the original comment was that it was a recommendation, but that definitely wouldn't be the best recommendation for everyone.
The only reason to use Windows in a corporate environment is because that's how it's always been done. That's changing though, because a lot of executives want Macs now, cause it's the new shiny thing. Maybe that'll start allowing other choices down the chain too.
I do all my work inside WSL anyway. I only use Windows at work because that's what IT gave me. They also offer macbooks.