Linux

48674 readers

355 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

103

How is MX Linux reigning #1 on Distrowatch? (lemm.ee)

submitted 8 months ago by zyratoxx@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please don't get me wrong, this is not meant to be rude slander. MX Linux is not a bad Distro at all (even tho I've always opted for Debian instead) and peops are free to use what suits them best.

But compared to other Distros (like Arch, Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian or Mint) there doesn't seem to be much excitement about it. I hardly see articles about MX and I have barely seen people outing themselves as MX users which makes me wonder:

Are MX users just low key quiet, am I escaping their presence or is there a different reason for MX' high HPD score?

Btw: feel free to take a shot every time I write MX :p

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Are MX users just low key quiet, am I escaping their presence or is there a different reason for MX' high HPD score?

That's definitely a factor. People write and talk about new and exciting stuff, MX is neither. There's no point in writing an article that goes: MX experience - same as a year ago because nothing changed, see ya again in a year.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i think xfce people in general don't fuck around with all that distro gobshitery. it's fast, works and isn't fancy.

gnome and kde people more likely to want to show off all the bullshit effects they're wasting all that ram on.

You wanna know what my ram has in it . . . data, glorious data.
Albeit being inefficiently monged into terrible statistical models by some shitty code i wrote.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I especially like it because it's trying to follow UNIX philosophy. All of its tools are separate and you can use them outside of Xfce or replace them altogether. For example KDE is still not at the point that you can launch the panel outside of it.

gnome and kde people more likely to want to show off all the bullshit effects they're wasting all that ram on.

It's not that much lighter than them though. KDE has gotten really close, and truly light DEs like LXDE and LXQT destroy Xfce on that front.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

Agreed, LXQT is the shit if you want a slow machine to go faster and look decent while doing it.

[–] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Still more informative than every "Chrome Unboxed" article ever lol