this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
712 points (95.8% liked)

Atheist Memes

5549 readers
860 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WeevilFriend@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I'm not sure about the founding fathers, but isn't that exactly why the pilgrims came to North America?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 64 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The British sent a bunch of crazy religious dicks off and hoped for the best.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 44 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I've been watching a lot of QI lately, and that was a topic in a recent episode I watched. You basically got it exactly.

The whole 'pilgrims escaping religious persecution' story is an absolute myth. The puritans basically wanted to be able to persecute others for not following their beliefs - they were the persecutors. It's wild (and similar to what we're seeing today).

So, the wannabe theocrats we have today are correct about the pilgrims wanting a theocracy (in 1620), but the people who we consider the Founding Fathers didn't actually found the country until 157 years later.

That's a big gap of time they're overlooking / disregarding.

Maybe we should just set them adrift like England did and hope for the best.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So much of the world is the fallout of the fucking brits screwing things up

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, more broadly, the age of imperial colonialism was bad for pretty much every civilization said empires came into contact with. The Spanish and Portuguese were doing heinous shit for centuries. Later, the Dutch, French, Belgians, Germans, Brits, the US (don’t forget the Native American genocide and the Monroe Doctrine, amongst other things), and others got in on the action (Japan is in this club too, largely taking their inspiration from the Portuguese and the Brits, but for mostly contextual reasons of “they seriously pissed off two much bigger empires right as they were getting into the positive economic feedback loop” - aka the Pacific Theater of WW2 - had their imperial colonial era substantially truncated).

More pointedly: empires existed before the age of European colonialism, but what with the advent of the age of sail, the Europeans unfortunately went down a road that was on average (arguably) far more nakedly exploitative and obviously unsustainable in the long run than any empire in history (excepting the Mongol empire, of course, which was more or less just Genghis doing a huge zerg rush with early-game cavalry and mounted archery units).

TL;DR: any reasonably-stable country in Europe (plus the US) with enough scratch to put together a halfway decent navy was getting in on the action for literal centuries.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago

Yes, no, it's complicated. If you wanted to cherry pick data for either direction, you can do it. It's more accurate to say there was a wide mix of ideologies.

Maybe we shouldn't be so beholden to the opinions of people from 200+ years ago.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I still don't get why this is so important to people. Yes there was a religious cult that came to what is now the US. Ok? It's a cute historical event but it doesn't add up to a whole lot.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, to the founding fathers, the monarchy was an entity like god. It was there but did nothing, helped them in no way and only took from them. They were all born into this colony where people were expected to serve a faceless king across the ocean.