this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
198 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3069 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] applepie@kbin.social 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah weird shilling hardware power at this point into tech cycle.. short of ML/AI work loads for GPUs, we have enough power for every day shit.

We need better software products to utilize them but all we got is fucking ad laden trash and spyware with every app.

Big tech lost their fucking minds.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need better software products to utilize them

100%.. for example.. they used Diablo Immortal as the example for the new ray tracing capabilities LOL

Common iPadOS L

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

for the new ray tracing capabilities LOL

Raytracing is cool, only why have it in games is beyond me.

Making wallpapers with POV-Ray - yes.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

...because it tends to enhance visuals?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

That's nice, and it's cool to see correct lighting and reflections in games, but that's if those are not broken by fuckload of shaders used incorrectly (that would be most modern games).

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm starting to wonder if the real reason the push for bigger screens caught on wasn't just because of the basic psychology of "bigger = better" but so they could shove more ads on screen, and now it's more processing power so those ads won't lock up the browser for a whole second while loading some bullshit questionnaire like "are you adult, child or gamer on iOS"

EDIT: So many downvotes lol are silicon valley tech bros mad?

[–] applepie@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

i would not put it past them, de-googling saves so much battery. that alone is benefit any tech enjoyer can get behind you would think, privacy is just a cherry.

but more broadly speaking it is amazing how they think they can run all these malicious code on people's devices because of some ToS EULA NDA X 69 Arbitration bullshit.

But nothing will change until people take their digital sovereignty back, literally only thing stopping the solution for most of this shit is poorly educated and complacent gen pop too busy jerking the feed to generate training data for some depraved AI girlfriend.

just take me to the farm already

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ok, new strategy: go back to 4:3.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

16:10 has always been superior to both but I quite like my second 4:3 monitor. Also I was referring to mobile devices obviously (where most internet traffic comes from), and 4:3 isn't a size measurement.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh.. I don't know if it sounded snarky, but mine was a joke. "If the extra space of 16:9 is going to be occupied by ads, better go back to 4:3 aspect ratio."

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't get that. 16:9 doesn't really add "extra space" to 4:3, it's just a different ratio of the same exact space in terms of horizontal to vertical proportions. A monitor of a certain size will have the same diameter regardless of aspect ratio.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

4:3 is objectively better than 16:9 for anything but watching movies.

I love 5:4 though.