this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
198 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3072 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 128 points 6 months ago (18 children)

I have an m2 iPad pro. The last thing it needs is more processing power, what it needs is better software to make use of the power that it has. I’d love to run full OS X on it considering I paid more than some MacBooks.

[–] applepie@kbin.social 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

Yeah weird shilling hardware power at this point into tech cycle.. short of ML/AI work loads for GPUs, we have enough power for every day shit.

We need better software products to utilize them but all we got is fucking ad laden trash and spyware with every app.

Big tech lost their fucking minds.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

I'm starting to wonder if the real reason the push for bigger screens caught on wasn't just because of the basic psychology of "bigger = better" but so they could shove more ads on screen, and now it's more processing power so those ads won't lock up the browser for a whole second while loading some bullshit questionnaire like "are you adult, child or gamer on iOS"

EDIT: So many downvotes lol are silicon valley tech bros mad?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ok, new strategy: go back to 4:3.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

16:10 has always been superior to both but I quite like my second 4:3 monitor. Also I was referring to mobile devices obviously (where most internet traffic comes from), and 4:3 isn't a size measurement.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh.. I don't know if it sounded snarky, but mine was a joke. "If the extra space of 16:9 is going to be occupied by ads, better go back to 4:3 aspect ratio."

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't get that. 16:9 doesn't really add "extra space" to 4:3, it's just a different ratio of the same exact space in terms of horizontal to vertical proportions. A monitor of a certain size will have the same diameter regardless of aspect ratio.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

4:3 is objectively better than 16:9 for anything but watching movies.

I love 5:4 though.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)