this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
599 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

34842 readers
13 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would that kind of provision allow me to have my code removed from a git repository history, if that git repository is hosted by a company?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

As long as you didn't give those rights by signing a CLA or a copyleft license. Never sign a CLA unless you're fully compensated.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I am not a lawyer, but I believe in general, yes.

Git is not even that convoluted, as all the history is stored in the .git folder within the repo. Unless there is some convoluted structure built on top, they would only need to move the repo folder to a trash disk, waiting to be formated.

That being said, GDPR is somewhat poorly enforced at the moment, unfortunately. I don't know if you can sue the company and expect some result within couple of years.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

No because user generated content is not protected.