this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
681 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2158 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A fifth of female climate scientists who responded to Guardian survey said they had opted to have no or fewer children

Ihad the hormonal urges,” said Prof Camille Parmesan, a leading climate scientist based in France. “Oh my gosh, it was very strong. But it was: ‘Do I really want to bring a child into this world that we’re creating?’ Even 30 years ago, it was very clear the world was going to hell in a handbasket. I’m 62 now and I’m actually really glad I did not have children.”

Parmesan is not alone. An exclusive Guardian survey has found that almost a fifth of the female climate experts who responded have chosen to have no children, or fewer children, due to the environmental crises afflicting the world.

An Indian scientist who chose to be anonymous decided to adopt rather than have children of her own. “There are too many children in India who do not get a fair chance and we can offer that to someone who is already born,” she said. “We are not so special that our genes need to be transmitted: values matter more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I knew when I was 12 I never wanted children. I got married at 20. I got fixed at 24. I am almost 40 and have no regrets other than not getting fixed sooner, but finding a doc to fix a lady at 18 is damn near impossible.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

A friend of mine had the same issue at 22. She even had already had a child at 16 but multiple doctors refused, claiming "she might want more". One doctor would do it but wanted a signed permission slip from her husband first.

All women deserve bodily autonomy.

[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I also needed my husband to approve for some reason. So demeaning.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Wow, wtf, that's crazy.

[–] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

fixed

Sorry but does it mean that you cut your tubes?

[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In my case I had a procedure called Essure done. But yeah I'm sterilized.

[–] squeakycat@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Recently cut, myself! Happy to have done so.

[–] Noedel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Nice. I'm getting snipped this week at 37. I felt comfort in keeping that door slightly ajar, but recently a lot of my friends having kids really pushed me over the line.