26
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cufta22@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Kinda sucks that systemd-boot is not themable

[-] Felix@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

But understandable as sd-boot tries to be as simple/fast as possible.

[-] irq0@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Felix@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

You can think whatever you want about systemd, but sd-boot is quite nice.

Just do a quick pacman -Si for both systemd and Grub. Grub is literally bigger in size, even though just by a little bit. And systemd has an entire bootloader and whatnot bundled with it.

Or just look at Grub's config. It's so clunky that there's literally a config file on your system which is used to make the actual config after running grub-mkconfig. A config file to make the proper config file…

Meanwhile all sd-boot needs to boot are 2 config files which are less than ten lines in total when combined.

I get why people call systemd bloated and such. But Grub isn't perfect either. It's way too complex for what most people need. A simple boot loader to get the system up and running.

Roast me you systemd haters and Devuan, Artix Void etc. elitists.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Systemd is not just one thing, it's a name for a collection of things.

So, yes, some systemd softwares are simple.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmasterrace

2166 readers
1 users here now

A community for Linux enthusiasts.

May your htop stats be low and your beard grow long

Welcome to !linuxmasterrace@feddit.de former r/linuxmasterrace members and existing Lemmyverse citizens: Feel free to join the newly created !linuxmasterrace@feddit.de community.

Let’s make the full transition to the decentralized Fediverse!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS