this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
2131 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

62936 readers
3422 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 81 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Why's everyone blaming the engineers lol, pretty sure they're just doing what they're told right?

[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly, headline should be more like "Google executives want Google engineers to make ad-blocking (near) impossible"

[–] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't Google famous for giving a large amount of creative freedom to their engineers (and having a lot of dead published products as a result)? Also, Google engineers are not exactly stuck at their job with little hope of finding anything else to survive.

[–] foo@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago
[–] ffolkes@fanexus.com 6 points 2 years ago

I believe that policy was reduced or removed many years ago. Around the time when all the cool new projects stopped, and Google scrubbed "don't be evil" from their site and company philosophy.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Just following orders is not the ironclad excuse some of you seem to think it is.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Look dude, I hate advertising as much as anyone. I don't want any TV and most streaming services have wedged in some form of advertising nowadays and I avoid all that.

But equating engineers trying to solve a problem like engineers figuring out how to block ads isn't really equivalent to murder.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

People only get held accountable for their actions and choices when the consequences are equivalent to murder? Their bosses hold some of the blame, sure, but they are not blameless and pretending they are just enables shit like this to keep happening.

[–] loom_in_essence@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They're still bad people, but this kind of blame has to run uphill. The devs only have the option of quitting, not necessarily of not doing what they're told.

That being said, I bet there are some Very Good Boys who enthusiastically and proactively suggest some evil shit to the execs.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

I mean shit, they aren't launching nukes here

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Doing what you're told does not relieve you of responsibility for the results of your actions

[–] Goodie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The engineers are not blame free, and can do super shady shit too. For example, the issues with the WebHID "broswer" APIs.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, because "just following orders" has worked out so well in the past.

That's right, I just godwin'd this bitch.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because it is still unclear if this is an official project requested by Google or just some engineers working alone until Google adopts the project.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The chances that a swashbuckling crew of rogue engineers organized a secret skunkworks project to implement their heartfelt, idealistic vision of an adblocker free web are… low.

[–] ultimate_question@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is exactly something an engineer who works at Google would want to work on, finding new ways to enrich Google is literally their job and there would be great personal benefit from coming up with the best way to implement this DRM crap for profit

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

True, but it's not zero

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Software engineers have ethics classes, I'd imagine this would fall highly under unethical, just under building software for the military which google employees have protested in the past.

[–] False@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Software engineers have ethics classes

We do?

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It was required for my degree, I'm sure it is required at more than just my university lol

[–] ryry1985@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not my university. Outside of the engineering classes and prequisites for engineering classes, we only had to take rhetoric and a foreign language.

[–] seang96@spgrn.com 5 points 2 years ago

That's disappointing to hear. Talked about ethics throughout my courses and one was half the class. Hopefully more professors and instructions sprinkle it in there at least.