this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
239 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
212 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] maryjayjay@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They are not vital. Almost no countries in the world practice trial by jury other than The US, the UK, Australia, Canada, and Ireland. The US is the only country in the world that uses trial by jury for civil cases.

The law is complex and nuanced. Most people lack the understanding and background to apply the law justly and uniformly. It is an antiquated idea that should go.

[โ€“] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, we should let the unbiased and just judicial system remove any potential check on it's power through the exclusion of a jury. Surely then things will be better. In fact I can't think of a single situation where allowing a judge and some lawyers to interpret the nuances of law led to anything terrible.

Nope, it's the stupid idiots who don't know anything about.... What ever I want to make up right now