4
submitted 5 months ago by Oofnik@kbin.social to c/news@kbin.social

A new South Dakota Board of Regents policy keeps employees from including their gender pronouns in school email signatures and other correspondence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] livus@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

I'm sympathetic to what you're saying but there's a part I just can't get on board with at all. I don't know if it's just that I come from a really different society to your one or what is going on here, but this paragraph doesn't ring true to me at all:

it’s never been socially acceptable to use they/them for a known person of a binary gender, and I’d argue that it’s even less acceptable now, thanks to the common adoption of they/them as a personal pronoun for known persons of nonbinary gender.

It's totally socially acceptable where I am to call people "they", or at least it always has been.

Didn't mean to insinuate anything about your English btw; in my experience most native English speakers don't have much interest in historical useage or etymology. Formal English style guides have only come on board with singular "they" in the last 15-20 years despite everyone using it colloquially for decades and decades.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

News

3 readers
4 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago