Technology

59378 readers

2923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-31

Does String Theory Actually Describe the World? AI May Be Able to Tell (www.wired.com)

submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Thanks, that was interesting. I kept thinking that this reads like something out of Quanta Magazine, and then at the end there was an attribution to them :)

To all the reflexive AI-downvoters: This is about an application of machine learning, not an LLM. Don't behave like an advanced autocomplete; think before you click :P

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a reflexive AI downvoter. I'm a reflexive String Theory downvoter.

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

...can't argue with that

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Why not both?

[–] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then the author could have written the headline as "Machine Learning" instead of clickbaity word like "AI"

[–] Identity3000@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In defence of the author, there is absolutely nothing about the term "AI" that just means "LLM" in an informed context (which is what Wired portends to be). And then the words "machine learning" are literally front and centre in the subtitle.

I don't see how anyone could misunderstand this unless it was a deliberate misreading... Or else just not attempting to read it at all...

(That said, yes, I do hate the fact that product managers now love to talk about how every single feature is "AI" regardless of what it actually is/does)