this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
370 points (95.1% liked)

solarpunk memes

2827 readers
976 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which doesn't really answer why the other guy disagreed with me.

[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The issue is that you called it dumb because you interpret it as "only children" are enlightened enough to see the tree as a tree.

But I don't believe that is the intent of the comic, instead, they simply drew a child as a shorthand representation for the concept of enlightenment.

I believe any person can be so enlightened to see something as it is, and not what it could be made into if they wanted to.

Therefore, I don't think the comic is dumb as you stated. I think the comic is attempting to motivate people to see things as they are and be enlightened.

Also there was a little humor in the misspelling of a common word when calling something dumb, in the way of "kettle calling the pot black"

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

I can see how me using the word dumb in that context could cause a disagreement, especially as I misspelled beauty, I could have used shallow instead.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago

Something about looking and not seeing. Or those who have eyes to see...I wonder if this is our mythical third eye, the ability to imagine, extrapolate eg child/inner child, in this instance.