Don't think I've seen this before. Don't even think the author has things for sale from what I can tell. Couldn't find an obvious option on any of my models to toggle this either.
Anyone know what's going on?
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)
3DPrinting
15561 readers
228 users here now
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io
There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is 
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How does this make any business sense from any angle?
Presumably, you have the actual file already, but you can't give some free advertising to the creator by posting a make of the file? Locking the file behind a paywall makes sense since that's the actual thing of value here. Locking a make behind a paywall is neutral for the consumer and a negative for the creator.
From the consumers' perspective, there is essentially zero incentive to pay just to post a picture of someone else's creation. There's no FOMO, there's nothing being 'withheld.' It's just one less step you have to do (assuming you wanted to do it in the first place).
So what happens here is the creator loses out on free advertising, the consumer isn't even mildly inconvenienced, and Prusa still gets zero revenue out of the whole deal.
Can someone give a rationale for this? Maybe something I'm missing?
I assume incompetence over malice. Which is to say it's probably a bug or a mistake setting up the model. The user isn't selling anything so it really seems like some sort of bug