295
Is Microsoft trying to commit suicide?
(www.antipope.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
295 points (94.3% liked)
Technology
58123 readers
4490 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
run IT for big companies.
The small minority are those people. I do IT consulting and have contracts with several companies... We're road-mapped to remove windows from everything possible, we deal in PII and cannot risk any facet of microsoft's nonsense to collect it. And windows has a history of turning shit back on after being explicitly disabled. The business market is much larger than the general consumer market. And new workers who grow up in environments like businesses that work in Linux, will likely have had chromebooks in school. Meaning that Windows will not be defacto in those people's lives at all. This is shooting themselves in the foot (or possibly face) indeed.
Hey it only took til 2024 to get it on the roadmap! Hopefully complete by . . . 202. . . 7?
By end of year outside of a handful of systems that are critical and cannot be replaced (My last count was literally a dozen). I spent a good chunk of last year ripping vmware and windows out of a lot of systems. I got halted this year because of SOC2 audits though... Gotta get back on the kill M$ train.
(Yay proxmox and whatever flavor of linux was easiest to support for a function [typically debian, sometimes alpine])
I work in healthcare IT. EHR clients and other necessary software that hold PHI (protected/private health information) run only on Windows. Recall seems to require a PC with a discrete 40 TOPs NPU so none of the current workstations. There is an opt-out already so I'm sure, though not positive, it can be turned off with a group policy.
I, optimistically, think this is a moot point for businesses. The goal is to get consumer data to sell not lose business purchases.
Cynically, I think it will be forced on consumers with, eventually, no option to turn it off.
OpenEMR doesn't. I also do some work in healthcare too for a small office. (Though admittedly not a lot at all). Paying a license (for support) to an opensource works for my client. It's opensource so I know it's not going away... and openemr is completely browser based as far as client goes.
Getting locked into these bullshit softwares is half the battle though when it comes to corporate shenanigans.
Edit:
I dunno... Some of this shit is leaking into the business/server side. More and more stuff appears that nobody asked for.
Also eClinicalWorks doesn't either, as it's also entirely cloud based. It does require (a user agent string that says) Chrome though.
And yes, I'm not worried about the computers I control; it's the ones we connect to that I don't which concern me.