364
submitted 3 months ago by manicdave@feddit.uk to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 15 points 3 months ago

I'm curious about your agile theory now !

[-] manicdave@feddit.uk 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's half way to self management.

Software exists in a world that kind of exists outside of property. Cynics like to think that Agile got big because as some kind of fad because the kids love it, but the reality is that fully hierarchical models just cannot keep up with self organising teams.

The old model - the model that most of the rest of the world of work still uses - simply cannot compete on a level playing field where the means of production (a cheap computer) are available to all. A landowner can stop you building your own house, but Microsoft can't really stop you building your own software, so they still have to put in work to collect rent.

Imagine what we could accomplish as a species if the goals and distribution of resources were also decided democratically.

[-] scoutFDT@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Microsoft can't stop you from building software...... yet.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

As I've been putting it: software is made of labor.

Unfortunately the actual reason Agile got big is that the cult of MBAs saw daily meetings putting scores on estimates and absolutely creamed their slacks.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Why the space before the punctuation

[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah haha it's really weird and I tend to switch between the "normal" way and the "french" way without noticing. Basically in french the rule is that if your symbol is "tall" ( ! , ? , brackets, semicolon, I think dashes as well...) it needs to be preceded by a space

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 months ago
[-] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 3 months ago

According to a company trying to sell its Agile replacement.

[-] Prox@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What a shit measure. A key idea is to fail fast and fail often, as this leads to faster growth through more frequent (re)assessment.

SW companies only care about profit. If failure rate is 268% higher but profit is simultaneously 10% higher, then Agile is the better choice.

[-] manicdave@feddit.uk 10 points 3 months ago

What is impact engineering though? If it's it's just agile while being cognisant of technical debt over MVPs, I don't know if it's necessarily that different.

It seems the study was designed to sell a book and I can't find anything about what that book says. I should probably read it but the bait way it's being sold makes me resistant to paying to find out.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The goddamn article you yourself posted as the proof mentions how it’s an ad right at the top

Even though the research commissioned by consultancy Engprax could be seen as a thinly veiled plug for Impact Engineering methodology, it feeds into the suspicion that the Agile Manifesto might not be all it's cracked up to be

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

It's much better to deliver useless projects afterall.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
364 points (82.5% liked)

Memes

45192 readers
2008 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS