this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
135 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2755 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Italian lorry driver has described the UK’s new post-Brexit controls as a “mess” after his lorry was held at a government-run border post for more than two days.

Antonio Soprano, 62, who was stopped while bringing plants into the country from central Italy, said he was offered nothing to eat during his 55-hour ordeal and instead was told by border officials that he should walk to a McDonald’s more than a mile away to get a meal.

After eventually being released from the Sevington facility in Ashford, Kent, in the early hours of the morning, he was then clamped and had to pay a £185 fine after difficulties finding a place to park in the middle of the night.

It comes just over a month after the government brought in new post-Brexit rules on 30 April, which require some lorries transporting plant and animal goods from the continent to be checked at designated border control posts along the British coast.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I don't think I will ever stop being astounded that it was revealed that the Brexit campaign was a big fraud and the British government just said, "oh well, too bad."

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You should look at the voice that started Brexit, where it came from, and where it is right now.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/V0pR8p9SWGw

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The government knew exactly what they were doing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

At the very least, Labour should have run on a ticket saying that people were led on and Brexit would not happen without another vote, but they basically said that the people had spoken as well.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago

That would be the move for any party that wasn't just controlled opposition.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A second vote sets a dangerous precedent if you ever want to do something unpopular.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When it's revealed there was fraud behind the original vote?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If there was fraud show the trial and proof it affected the outcome, then start talking about another vote. There's essentially some low levels of fraud in every vote.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The precedent would be you have to explicitly say what you're going to do in the first vote.

Every single person in the campaign was "oh we'd never leave the single market" and when that became an option afterwards it needed a new referendum.