1320
The truth... (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

They blew up an enemy military ship that had already destroyed a peaceful planet and was in the process of killing them.

Nice try

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Which presents the dilemma perfectly. Decision to destroy the planet was made by a higher-up, thus do all Death Star "employees" deserve to die?

[-] menas@lemmy.wtf 7 points 3 months ago

We aren't speaking about employee in an hydroelectric dam. Even if both took part in an the economy of an oppressive system, one give electricity, the other mass murder. If they do not agree with, they think that taking part in this crime give them more chance than deserting.

Whenever You Gamble, My Friend, Eventually You’ll Lose.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

They are military, not employees. Fair game.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Depends though doesn't it. Was it conscription or voluntary. Some of those military were forced to join the empire or have their planets blown up. Obviously many were zealots but im sure if it wasnt for vader, many of the soldiers wouldnt have joined.

When it comes to people being forced into the military is it still fair game?

[-] Censored@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No, the Empire only recently gained the ability to blow up planets. No one joined under threat of their planet being blown up.

And yes, conscripts are fair game. Unless they A) rebel against their commanders and/or B) immediately surrender. As long as they keep running the death machine, they are culpable.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Only a sith deals in absolutes!

[-] Censored@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's not an absolute system. It's a system where a person's culpability is determined by their actions.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ok, i was trying to make a joke to diffuse what was clearly an attempt to argue with me in a serious way about something that i was only arguing in a light-hearted way.

I dont agree with you that someone being forced to join a military makes them exempt from any moral consideration when trying to determine whether to blow up a space station they are on.

What choice would you have made if you had a gun to your head?

[-] Censored@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not saying it's a fair system, I am just saying they are a valid military target.

But I'd like to think that I wouldn't kill innocent people even if someone pointed a gun at my head. Of course no one knows how far they'll go to survive until they're put in dire circumstance.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I can only speak for myself but yes even being conscripted would put you in the fair game category.

If I am given the choice between slaughtering others or risking being shot in the back as I run away, I'm going to take the risk of getting shot.

Someone will now come in and call me a liar and I really don't mind. I do put the value of others lives above mine on a regular basis. Volunteer firefighters do it every day.

[Edited to remove unnecessary crudeness. Old habits die hard.]

[-] Censored@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They are serving in the Empire's Army, so yes. Despite the fact that they were conscripted. If they didn't want to be killed, they should have organized a massive uprising against their leaders and surrendered the Death Star to the rebel scum.

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1320 points (93.4% liked)

People Twitter

4972 readers
726 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS