this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
495 points (93.2% liked)

memes

10191 readers
2314 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I had In The House - In A Heartbeat playing in my head while making this meme

sorry for the pixelation in the corner, I used a shitty website which put a watermark there

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can arguing about arguing all you want, it's not gonna change the facts.

But I do love the "read more articles about this". The thought of which articles is chilling, considering.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You provided an article, or do simple words confuse you thus?

And what facts? More claims, let’s see these facts that have now claimed have been provided.

Why can’t you answer simple questions? You want to claim the income limitations aren’t discrimination, yet you won’t explain how… what a shocker.

If you do, we can easily explain how it isn’t, but clearly you have trouble accepting that your opinion can’t be wrong.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OK, here's what you do. You start this thread from the top, then you get to the part that tells you how this works. Then you stop.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I did, there’s lots of people explaining the same thing to you…..

https://lemmy.zip/comment/11051328

It’s a very simple concept, using income as a limitation, is a free way to discriminate against anyone you want who would be a burden. And you get people like you, who justify it, so they get to continue to do it. You want less, raise it, want more, lower it. They picked a specific number for a reason…..

Look we explained it, and we didn’t even need to get your opinion, since it’s just plain wrong…. Shocker….

If you have money, you’re not a burden… as we established back at comment 2… yet you continued to argue this same asinine point.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io -2 points 4 months ago

It's not an opinion, it's how things work, as established by both reality and personal experience. You can keep the inane responses for as long as you want, friend, you're not gonna dimension hop.