this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1272 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21278 readers
966 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Couldn’t find anything with less pixels, please save to disk and remove resolution yourself ❤️

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] brokenlcd@feddit.it 68 points 5 months ago (1 children)
    [–] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 58 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I had a problem and then I tried to solve it by installing a snap package. Now I have two problems.

    [–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I was doing a group project in college where we had a Linux server running some of our custom software. I asked a group mate who worked in IT to self-sign some certs so we could get https up and running for our next sprint demo.

    He installed a fucking snap package to do it via certbot. On fucking RHEL. And that server was not hosting an internet-accessible service. And he didn’t know why I lost my mind.

    [–] brokenlcd@feddit.it 14 points 5 months ago

    Basically a "lemme get the flame thrower real quick so i can hammer that nail in for ya"

    [–] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    Not sure why you were enabling HTTPS for a project that was not hosting an internet-accessible service, really. By which I assume you mean the service doesn't have a publicly accessible web based UI or API component. What were you trying to access and how? The only scenario I could think of for this would be that your custom software relies on HTTPS for secure communication within its own internal network (such as on a VPN) to send sensitive data back and forth between services. In which case that feels like overkill for a college course, since you shouldn't have any genuinely sensitive data that you need to secure if it's just for testing and demonstration.

    [–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    It was a project requirement, PHI was processed by it, so yes, it needed a secure connection. I now realize I should have used mutual auth, but hey, I only learned about that after that project

    We never sent actual data to it (the actually sensitive data used for training never left a secure VM), but the point of the course was to act like we were. Plus, setting up an nginx reverse proxy is simple, setting it up and getting certs from some ssl commands is a 10 minute task that appeases the project manager/professor with minimal effort.

    [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I'll be honest, I've had times where there's the "simple" solution, and "the solution I remember off the top of my head", and 10/10 the one that's happening is the one that I remember because I just did it last week.

    I have no desire to google the arguments for self signing a cert with openssl, and I cannot remember which webserver wants the cabundle and the public cert in the same file. If I had done it even kinda recently I'd still remember what to poke in the certbot config.

    [–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    If you have no desire to do rudimentary googling for a group project in college, that sounds like you aren’t a very helpful teammate. Last time I generated certs I used the first stack overflow result and was done in minutes, there’s no excuse.

    [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    This is confusing to me, because the point of the request seems to be "get a certificate", not "get a self signed certificate generated by running the openssl command". If you know how to get the result, it doesn't really matter if you remembered offhand the shitty way or the overkill way.

    Is it really more helpful to say "I remember how to do this, but let me lookup a different way that doesn't use the tools I'm familiar with"?

    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Okay, I may be the stupid one here. But after a quick search, I don't see an obvious way to generate self-signed certs using certbot. Even letsencrypt's own website suggests using openssl.

    [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I think they generated real certs, rather than self signed.

    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Then that's actually against what was wanted. To get real certs, you have to open up the server to the internet.

    [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

    That's not the case, you just need to be able to make an outbound connection.

    The minutiae of how certbot works or if that specific person actually did it right or wrong is kind of aside the point of my "intended to be funny but seemingly was not" comment about how sometimes the easiest solution to implement is the one you remember, even if it's overkill for the immediate problem.

    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Just say no if you don't want to do something. I don't understand why people think fucking shit up in the guise of helping is more acceptable than admitting that you can't (or maybe just don't want to) do something.

    [–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Do you think that, in this example, using certbot is fucking shit up, or breaking something?

    The thing about overkill is that it does work. If you're accustomed to using a solution in a professional setting, it's probably both overkill and also vastly more familiar than the bare minimum required for a class project that would be entirely unacceptable in a professional setting.

    In OPs anecdote, they did get their certificates, so I don't quite see your "intentionally fucking things up" claim as what's happening.

    [–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    To me, (and it seems for OP as well), installing snap on RHEL in itself is fucking things up.

    [–] brokenlcd@feddit.it 0 points 5 months ago

    You can say what you want i still prefer appimages to snaps, old school windows stile ftw