this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
-49 points (25.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

29723 readers
957 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
quinten@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
-49
Is "food" a social construct? (lemm.ee)
submitted 5 months ago by TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hear me out. There's nothing innate to an object that makes it "food". It's an attribute we give to certain things that meet certain qualities, i.e. being digestible, nutritious, perhaps tasty or satisfying in some way, etc. We could really ingest just about anything, but we call the stuff that's edible "food". Does that make it a social construct?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Our naming and classification of things is all socially constructed. So yes, our categorization of edible things as food is a social construct, but our physical need to fuel our bodies with something digestible is not. But also, using it that way makes existence a social construct, so it depends on how rigid you want to be.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Our naming and classification of things is all socially constructed. So yes, our categorization of edible things as food is a social construct, but our physical need to fuel our bodies with something digestible is not.

i love you

But also, using it that way makes existence a social construct, so it depends on how rigid you want to be.

Explain. (warning lemmings may get mad)

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We define what existence is. We have all collectively agreed that being here in the perceptible world means that something exists. We could choose to include the imaginary in its definition and then would be able to say that dragons and wizards exist. We could also choose to say something has to be present in 4 dimensions to exist, in which case we'd not be able to say that anything exists.

A social construct is simply an idea that has been created and accepted by the people in a society which includes the dictionary itself. I'd also say that these definitions are often useful at allowing us to communicate and cooperate with one another, but that doesn't mean we didn't make up the idea.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Excellent! So what's underneath all this, then? Can something be both real and a social construct? What things aren't social constructs?

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If the thing in question is changed, and the only part of us that can directly affect is our opinion, then I would call that a social construction.