this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
184 points (90.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
485 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
14specks@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
184
So what are the climate change denialists in your life saying right now? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

With the month long heat wave.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] DerKriegs@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While your numbers, if factual (no source posted), are statistically correct (in that it won't make our species go extinct), you have to remember a simple fact: those numbers represent individual human lives. Family, friends, neighbors, your pizza guy, etc. Pretty brutal to be so flippant about.

Also, this doesn't take into account the potential for cascading environmental system failures that could be caused by such warming. These unknowns could greatly change the equation.

I realize you are mainly arguing the point in response to "existential threats" being bandied about, but it's a weird stance to take here.

[โ€“] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's a real issue and actions needs to be taken to prevent the worst case scenario but I find it not useful when people extraggerate the dangers of it. It makes people suspicious about what other things we're being misled about.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health

[โ€“] DerKriegs@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the solid source! I do understand the need for keeping the discussion real, but the article clearly states,

...concluded that to avert catastrophic health impacts and prevent millions of climate change-related deaths...

Sounds pretty existential to me, at a scale we have never experienced.

[โ€“] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. I'm in no way against fighting the climate change and under no illusion that it's not going to affect the lives of billions of people and will lead to probably tens of millions of unecessary deaths. It's a true crisis.

I just personally get irritated when people talk about it as if an asteroid is heading towards earth and is going to wipe out us all. It's unproductive and causes extreme anxiety to many (especially young) people who don't know better and it's also free ammunition for climate change deniers to point out how "the libs lie about this too" etc.

[โ€“] DerKriegs@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

That anxiety bit is too true, it has me fairly despondent when I think about it too long. It's fair assertion you make, for sure.