this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
676 points (94.4% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
800 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BurnedDonutHole@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Out of the loop. Can someone give me a short explanation?

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Sorry for hijacking your comment, it's the first one that popped up for me when I opened this thread.

If you're just discovering this post, trust me, it's not worth reading. The comments are 50% nazis and 50% morons. There is no discourse ahead, only name calling, denouncing, whataboutism, and some really fucked up thoughts and people. You don't need this in your day. You already know that nazis are bad, and nazis aren't the only bad people. Go to illegallysmolcats instead

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like always, the intolerant people expect to be tolerated, and when they aren't they bitch about free speech

[–] Beliriel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The instance at exploding-heads.com got defederated from by a lot of instances and among them the largest one lemmy.world
It happened due to them allowing hatespeech like "tranny faggot". Top post now is complaining about how the rest is sensitive libs and in the same breath call "Joe Biden is a pedo". They're throwing a tantrum about how they're getting cancelled because they can't smell the shit under their own shoe.

[–] earthquake@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not necessary to repeat the hate speech they got defederated over, you can just say "transphobic/homophobic slurs".

[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But the words themselves don't mean anything more than the context they're used in. I absolutely think you should be able to freely write the bad words that you are talking about to better explain what happened instead of censoring it. It's obvious that op used it to spread information and not in a negative context, isn't it?

[–] earthquake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, there's a difference between use and mention, but slurs are still slurs even outside of a negative context or without hateful intent.

Repeating slurs isn't always necessary and can sometimes still be emotionally draining for the targetted group to see even outside of the negative context. Just something to keep in mind.

[–] SpookySnek@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I completely respect your opinion! And I see where you are coming from.