this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
550 points (97.4% liked)

Games

32518 readers
823 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
shitpostpolice@lemmy.world
Dremor@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
550
Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset (www.gamespot.com)
submitted 5 months ago by Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
166 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Neither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn't tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.

[โ€“] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

because Fallout 3 is at least fallout-ish despite its horrible writing, story, and world building.

4 is just a shooter game with Vault Tec and Super mutants thrown into it.