261
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by TVgog56789@lemy.lol to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BaldDude@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Good point, thanks!

As long as the hand count is recognized as the actual result i would be fine with that.Knowing humans and our tendency to be lazy, i fear we would first reduce the redundant checks and then skip them completely. In the name of efficiency of course.

Also after witnessing the history of absolute fuckups my government (germany) produced in the field of software and IT, i don’t want them to use machines. They lost any trust i had in them with any kind of technology. Let them count and add up by hand, i’ll gladly pay extra taxes for that.

Maybe i’m just a bit to paranoid :/

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

As long as the hand count is recognized as the actual result i would be fine with that

That's how it works, yeah. Since there's unlikely to be any issue with the machine count, that works fine for getting results on the day, but ultimately you have the paper record that can be checked by hand, or run through different counting machines, in order to verify if there's any concerns.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
261 points (86.6% liked)

People Twitter

5173 readers
682 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS