this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
46 points (92.6% liked)

News

23361 readers
4037 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Seems like if they wanted to shut it down, rescheduling it first would be an unnecessary step since it's currently schedule one.

It will be a messy transition, as the article points out. But I doubt the point is to shut it down. Especially considering the political climate around cannabis and the messaging from the White House.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

but rescheduling allows them to add regulations just like when this happened to ejuices

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unlikely. The public and political agendas are just the opposite for the two substances: most people support the expansion of cannabis products and oppose the expansion of nicotine products.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

safe effective nicotine consumption were generally supported by the public too and was being ingrained in the culture in movies and tv

now it is combustible cigarettes with alcohol being heavily promoted again as well in television and film

if the US does not stop voting in senile past retirement age religious right leaning presidents who view any alteration in the citizen's conscience it might not ever change or get better

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

As flying squid helped me see, safer doesn't mean safe.

Nicotine alone can cause cancer and while vaping is 'safer' than tobacco, in that it's less carcinogenic, it is still a carcinogen. And because of the ROA, vaping is actually more addictive than cigarettes.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222281/

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

safe effective nicotine consumption

What evidence do you have that there is such a thing?

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

the synthetic nicotine being produce is done with green chemistry meaning no heavy metals used in synthesis

with the nicotine being lab made no ground pollutants such as lead and other heavy metals are present just like fake vanilla extract which most seasoning coming from India with polluted soil

also less soil less environmental impact

the ingredients have gotten safer over time as well also leading to changes in other industries

hugely better product both health and environmental and all around

not to mention not have the ill effects of second hand smoke

my own lung capacity was around 80% and dropping during the years was consuming combustible nicotine and cannabis products but now is above 90% had my lungs checked by a doctor

lightyears healthier

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

None of that has to do with your claim, and it is also more claims instead of evidence.

Where's your evidence that there is a safe level of nicotine consumption?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nevermind this, see my reply to squid below. I was operating under the wrong view that nicotine by itself is not cancer causing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Safer is not safe.

I agree, it's safer. But how can we know it's safe below a certain amount for lifelong vapers when there hasn't been enough time to do a long-term study?

Wouldn't (and I say this as a long-term cannabis vaporizer myself) putting anything into the lungs on a regular basis other than air be inherently unsafe long-term?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nothing is 100% safe. Which is why harm reduction is an important part of the conversation when discussing drug addiction.

Water is safer than tea. Tea safer than coffee. All three can in theory kill you if consumed in large enough quantities.

Anyway, I figured I would dig around more on vaping instead of just glancing at the top search result.

And, I take what I said back. Nicotine by itself causes cancer. Tobacco just makes it more likely.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222281/

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with you on the "safer" thing at all, but OP said that it was "safe."

But this has become moot anyway based on your research.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, my bad for glancing at the top search result before I made my long-winded post above lol.

Hope you're well, Mr. Squid.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No better than I have been in over a year, but we're working on it. Thanks.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sorry to hear that. My mental health is finally on the mend. Giving myself permission to be myself for the first time in my life, really.

Hope things get better for you soon :)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's great! Good luck to you!

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago