1102

submitted 4 months ago by schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

738 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Alt text:

An idling gas engine may be annoyingly loud, but that's the price you pay for having WAY less torque available at a standstill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ZDL@ttrpg.network -2 points 4 months ago

Switching to an electric car is a 100% reduction in carbon usage for my commute.

Is it really? Are you positive?

How is your electricity generated. Coal, natural gas, or oil? Congratulations, your carbon usage is HIGHER with an EV than with an ICE! Is it hydro? Go look at the methane produced by those huge reservoirs. I haven't seen the calculations, but it's not neutral.

Oh, I know. You use solar and/or wind. Now look up the environmental costs of producing those. And of mining the special metals needed for the batteries. Or if you're nuked, the costs of mining uranium.

Switching to an EV is not the simple "zero carbon" solution you seem to imagine it to be.

[-] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Because building non renewable power doesn't have a carbon cost right? And buying a petrol powered car doesn't have a carbon cost, right?

I'm talking about my commute. The carbon cost of driving to work from my home.

Don't strawman if you want your argument to be taken seriously - because what I read above translates to Crying neckbeard meme

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024

1102 points (96.3% liked)

xkcd

8766 readers

96 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

koraro@lemmy.world