this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
754 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

One very silly thing I often observe in these 50s-era depictions of space life is the absurd waste of space, as if (if any of this happens) every square millimeter wouldn’t be occupied by power or life-support systems (including, in this case, food crops).

Nobody’s gonna build a dome for your French Colonial revival house and giant lawn with, like, a couple of oak trees so that you can have your dog run around.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Red Mars pretty much depicted that as well, with a big plastic bubble enclosing the required green space. I think it's reasonable to assume that you'd need the technology to create some bubbles well in advance before you could do anything on a planetary scale.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

And I’m not arguing that there wouldn’t be, say, a bubble that was just an arboretum or something like that, just that such a space would be specifically designated and its size/resource requirements be limited.