this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
207 points (94.4% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2676 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It seems to me that, since the set of real numbers has a total ordering, I could fairly trivially construct some choice function like "the element closest to 0" that will work no matter how many elements you remove, without needing any fancy axioms.

I don't know what to do if the set is unordered though.

[–] wisha@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I give you the entire real line except the point at zero, what will you pick? Whatever you decide on, there will always be a number closer to zero then that.

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

I guess I can pick another number x to be closest to but it has the same problem unless I can guarantee it's in the set. And successfully picking a number in the set is the problem to begin with! Foiled again!