this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
119 points (92.8% liked)

Gaming

20010 readers
756 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boerbiet@feddit.nl 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To me, they are both winners. I loved Phantom Liberty and just started playing it again last week, only for it to be interrupted by Shadow of the Erdtree. Both DLC's reminded me how much I loved the base game and both are proper and large content additions. And they both run perfectly on Linux on day 1 <3.

Both these games and their DLC's are in my opinion what other game studios should aim for.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Um, it's Blood and Wine, the Wicher 3 DLC that held the crown, not phantom liberty.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This was a surprise to me, too. I naturally assumed the author was referencing Phantom Liberty because, y'know... it's fucking excellent.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

Blood and Wine was honestly amazing. I haven’t enjoyed a DLC or xpac that much since Diablo II: Lord of Destruction. I think maybe the Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind’s expansion Bloodmoon was a great contender as well, but Blood and Wine just took Witcher 3 to a new level. It truly deserved its spot at the top of the heap.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Blood and Wine was exceptional. Much like Shadow of the Erdtree, there was enough content added that they could have almost justified releasing it as a full game. There are full games released today with less content than Blood and Wine brought to TW3.